# Most surprisingly portable Gregor Richards ## Judges' comments: ### To build: make richards ### To run: ./richards ### Try: echo '10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1*p*p*p*p*p*p*p*p*p' | ./richards ### Selected Judges Remarks: Oh no, yet another dc-style calculator? (see 2000/dlowe using an embedded Perl interpreter and deemed Worst Abuse of the Rules). Well, this one does it (expression calculation, that is, not the rule abuse) in a different way. The author claims that his calculator does just-in-time compilation. What would you do to prove or disprove his claim without attempting to unravel the source? ## Author's comments: This is an implementation of the classic UNIX dc command, the reverse-polish calculator. Actually it's a pretty bad implementation, since it only implements 32-bit integers (well, sizeof(int)-sized integers). It only implements the commands +, -, *, /, p (only for numbers), register stacks, macros and comparisons. Wow, you'd think I could've done better in 2K of code. OH! I forgot to mention! It's a JIT. Wait, don't stop reading! I know what you're thinking, platform-specific code is discouraged in IOCCC. But do you see any platform-specific code? There's no assembler here! This JIT works on a dozen platforms, and the only platform-specific assumptions it makes are that the stack grows down and integers are at least 32-bit. You will probably get warnings while compiling the code. In particular: * If your system requires the inclusion of alloca.h to use alloca, use the compile flag -DAH * If your system cannot use mmap, use the compile flag -DNM * I don't include any headers I don't strictly need to, so you'll get warnings about (at least) memcpy, isdigit, atoi, calloc, malloc and alloca if you didn't use -DAH. * GCC likes to complain about while (a = b) (assignments as a condition). * I don't return from main, even though it's declared to return int. Platforms on which all known/tested optimization levels work with no additional flags: * gcc 4.6.2 + x86[_64] + GNU/Linux, Mac OS X or Windows * clang 2.9-16 + x86[_64] + GNU/Linux or Mac OS X * tcc 0.9.25 * gcc 4.4.5 + alpha, arm, mips[el], powerpc[64], s390x (IBM zSeries) * gcc 4.1.3 + vax + NetBSD Platforms which work but not at all optimization levels or needing special flags: * owcc 1.9 + x86 + Windows: Needs -DNM -DAH -fno-stack-check * gcc 4.4.5 + sh4: -O0 works, higher optimization levels don't work for unknown reasons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------